On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 5:34 AM, David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net>wrote:
> On 3 March 2011 19:26, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 20:16, Dr. David Kirkby <david.kir...@onetel.net> > wrote: > >> IIRC we have not been successful in recent times. Do we get any feedback > >> why? > > > > No, one vague guess is that there is a limit for each topic and we are > > - obviously - in a small "math software" topic. Let's see, trying > > again doesn't hurt. > > > > H > > > Perhaps a very different approach is needed. One thing I feel Sage > lacks is engineering applications. How about basing the applications > upon building engineering applications on the top of maths software, > rather than adding more maths? > > It may be seen by Google that their injection of money will make > little difference if it just adds yet more maths skills to a project > which is primarily built by mathematicians. > > Just a thought. It's probably worth having a rethink, as recent > applications have been unsuccessful, so unless the formula is changed, > it is quite likely we will fail again. > dave > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > Hello Dr. David Kirkby, It may be a trivial question but couldn't get what is IIRC. Is it IRC? Googleing didn't return much relevant results. -- -Regards Hector Whenever you think you can or you can't, in either way you are right. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
