On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 03:48:00PM +0000, David Kirkby wrote: > On 14 March 2011 13:38, Nils Bruin <nbr...@sfu.ca> wrote: > > On Mar 13, 4:34?pm, Julien PUYDT <julien.pu...@laposte.net> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> among the few failing tests with my ARM built, two are because of > >> accuracy reasons : > >> > >> File "/home/jpuydt/sage-4.6.2/devel/sage/sage/functions/other.py", line > >> 497: > >> ? ? ?sage: gamma1(float(6)) > >> Expected: > >> ? ? ?120.0 > >> Got: > >> ? ? ?119.99999999999997 > > > > Why are we even testing the behaviour on floats? Isn't sage's default > > floating point type RDF? > > If the trac ticket number was a comment in the code, as I suggested on > another thread,
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/msg/e2dbfb6705278dd8?hl=en > > then it would be easy to see why it was chosen. You can use hg to find out which commit added it, and if that commit is recent enough it will have the trac ticket number in the commit message. This is what version control systems are for... -Willem Jan -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
