Please review ticket #10620 to upgrade sphynix Pablo
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > I also prefer trac, but I know why: it's shorter! Also it's more clearly > related to trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac . Patch comments also say stuff like > "trac #1234", not "ticket #1234". > > And yeah, I'm with John - it's a waste to use sphinx and not take advantage > of its capabilities. The same goes for all the tools we use, really, > including trac itself (if you have any ideas about how to better utilize > trac, you might want to contact Maarten in another thread floating around > sage-devel recently...) > > -Keshav > > ---- > Join us in #sagemath on irc.freenode.net ! > > -- > To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to > sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel > URL: http://www.sagemath.org > -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
