On May 11, 11:25 am, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > I don't think we need a process at this point. I'd say release early & > often. Even if its not perfect; Good is good enough.
No, no, my point was not adding bureaucracy, but rather figuring out how to get people to actually give positive review on these translations - clearly people are too tentative on this. Given that this is documentation, not new functionality, there is a difference in the 'early and often', though (i.e., we consider *wrong* results to be blockers, presumably also massively wrong doc) so it could be beneficial to discuss it to help *encourage* people to review X[0] even if they don't feel like they can do X[1], where X is a translation and the indices are aspects of it. But if no one does, then I guess our current state will be the default. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
