> [4] http://flask.sagenb.org/home/pub/72/ > > When I wrote this code in 2007, for some range of matrix sizes and > bitsizes it was the fastest code in the world (even solidly beating > Magma, which was the fastest before)... mainly since IML is so damned > good. I don't know what the current situation is.
Sage still beats Magma. Using sage-4.7.1.alpha1 with magma-2.17-8 on skynet/eno and making the obvious modifications to your code to add Magma, I get 50 x 51 -- Sage: 0.02 secs, Magma: 0.09 secs 100 x 101 -- Sage: 0.07 secs, Magma: 0.43 secs 150 x 151 -- Sage: 0.16 secs, Magma: 1.45 secs 200 x 201 -- Sage: 0.35 secs, Magma: 3.44 secs 250 x 251 -- Sage: 0.54 secs, Magma: 8.26 secs --- Mariah Lenox -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
