> That would be nice, but I don't know how much you can do numerically > given a "black-box" sequence.
So you are saying one couldn't do anything even if one made an assumption about polynomial growth (i.e., lots less than the exponential growth in the denominator)? That is, very simplistic looping and hoping would be the best one could hope for? I guess that makes sense. > Maybe it would be better to try to implement something symbolic in Sage? Sure, it would just be very low on my list, since it would be purely for demonstration, not actual computation. - kcrisman -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
