On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Jason Grout <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/22/11 3:39 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote: >> >> Hi Andrei, >> >> On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Andrei<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> You probably know that GitHub is extremely popular hosting for >>> open-source >>> projects (https://github.com/about). I think it would be very beneficial >>> for >>> SAGE to be mirrored to GitHub as well. >> >> You are more than welcome to mirror Sage at GitHub. Also, as Sage uses >> Mercurial, it's more logical to use bitbucket.org to mirror Sage as >> this involves no hassle regarding conversion from one revision control >> system to another. > > There's no reason not to have both, other than the work, of course... > > I think one big reason to mirror to github has to do with github possibly > having far more users (see > https://github.com/blog/865-github-dominates-the-forges, though they don't > compare to bitbucket there, so of course the conclusion about bitbucket is > unwarranted)
It's a bit unclear what the advantages of having a (read-only) mirror there are. What's your goal? Now if pull requests could be automatically turned into tickets, that'd be cool :). - Robert -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
