On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 06:05:22 Volker Braun wrote: > Looks like intel uses a completely different naming scheme instead > of liblapack.so / libcblas.so / libf77blas.so. Francois' suggestion of > renaming the intel MKL libraries to something standard is a good one, though > it might not work. Since intel already went through the trouble of renaming > all libraries, I wouldnt' be surprised if they split up the blas functions > in strange ways over their set of libraries I think that's the only way that has a chance of working with a stock sage and sage's spkgs. I must say that in sage-on-gentoo I have worked to allow the use of any blas/lapack available in portage but I have never tried to use intel mkl nor do I know anyone who has done it.
Francois This email may be confidential and subject to legal privilege, it may not reflect the views of the University of Canterbury, and it is not guaranteed to be virus free. If you are not an intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and erase all copies of the message and any attachments. Please refer to http://www.canterbury.ac.nz/emaildisclaimer for more information. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
