On Aug 17, 4:26 am, Ivan Andrus <[email protected]> wrote: > On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:51 PM, kcrisman wrote: > > >>> If the owner forgot about the ticket (holidays and stuff), I think it > >>> is perfectly fine if the author him- or herself asks on one of the > >>> sage lists (probably sage-devel is a good choice, or a specialised > >>> list if that exists for the given topic). > > > I think that "owner" is little more than a random name of someone who > > has asked to receive notifications about this type of ticket. > > Oops. I usually make myself owner of tickets that I am working on, mostly > because that's how we did it where I used to work.
Oh, that's different! You can totally do that. I just mean that there is always a "default" owner of a ticket, depending on its component. > > I don't think you should blame yourself. I think there is a lot more > > ownership of Sage by people other than William Stein now, which is > > very positive. However, that said, having his energy is very > > helpful :) > > > There's also the issue of people not having as much time to review as > > before? We definitely need more reviewers in the mix. > > Another trick is to review someone else's ticket and then ask them to review > yours. e.g. kcrisman has reviewed so many of my tickets that I would be > obliged to review anything he asked me to (assuming I were competent to do so > of course). Unfortunately, I can't help with probability distributions, or I > would ask you to review some of mine :-) > > -Ivan > > P.S. kcrisman, I've been planning to work on 8473, but can't seem to find the > time. Thanks for your patience. No problem - I'm excited about it, though. The double-click has been much requested, as you are well aware. -- To post to this group, send an email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
