Dear Burcin,
> thanks a lot for looking into this.
>
> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:13:49 -0800 (PST)
> Jean-Pierre Flori <jpfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > By the way:
> > - I used Burcin's patch, somehow I could not use Florent's one
> > - The patch is based on pynac-0.2.2, but applies on 0.2.3
> > Here is the output of the patch version
> > sage: class bla(SageObject):
> > ....: def __add__(self, other):
> > ....: print "Add"
> > ....:
> > sage: m1 = bla()
> > sage: m2 = bla()
> > sage: a = x.ind[m1]
> > sage: b = x.ind[m2]
> > sage: a+b
> > x.<class '__main__.bla'> + x.<class '__main__.bla'>
> > sage: a+a
> > 2*x.<class '__main__.bla'>
>
> Your patch for pynac works great here. Starting from plain Sage-4.7.2
> and pynac-0.2.3, doctesting the usual suspects
> (sage/{symbolic,calculus,functions}) shows only a couple of printing
> differences. Considering this change within the context of #9880, they
> are mostly harmless. :)
>
> I merged your patch in my pynac queue [1]. We'll have to sort out the
> headers once #9880 is done and we're making the pynac release.
>
>
> [1] https://bitbucket.org/burcin/pynac-patches/src
>
>
> Florent, shall we create a temporary pynac spkg so you can carry on
> with your work on indexed expressions?
Please do ! I didn't had time to work on it this week but I hope to have very
soon (TM).
Cheers,
Florent
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
