Please hijack this. It would nice to see this get finished. Also, if
you want any help let me know. I just kinda forgot about this. -Taylor

On Mar 30, 1:08 pm, Luis Finotti <luis.fino...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:09:02 AM UTC-4, Niles Johnson wrote:
>
> > Indeed, these are good places to look -- especially the recommendation of
> > browsing the rings directory to see how those are implemented (e.g.
> > polynomial rings).  It might make more sense for RingOfWittVectors to
> > inherit from CommutativeRing instead of Ring.  Also, it wouldn't be a bad
> > idea to open a Trac ticket for this now.  Then I and other interested
> > parties could continue to discuss specifics of your implementation there.
>
> I was about to create a ticket when I found this: ticket 
> 11457<%20http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11457>.
> It is nice as it gives me somewhere to start.  Should I (or we) highjack
> this or open a new ticket?  I was planning on implementing sums and
> products in a different way (and more efficient, in many cases), but give
> the user a few different choices of methods to perform the computations.
>
> BTW, I am going to use bitbucket to keep my (not ready for prime time)
> code:https://bitbucket.org/finotti/witt-sage.  It already has some code
> (as ".sage" files) and I will put my (slow) updates there.  If anyone wants
> write access, just write me and I can add you.
>
> I should also say that I might have quite a few time constrains these
> days...  I don't expect to get this done until mid summer.

-- 
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to 
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org

Reply via email to