Please hijack this. It would nice to see this get finished. Also, if you want any help let me know. I just kinda forgot about this. -Taylor
On Mar 30, 1:08 pm, Luis Finotti <luis.fino...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Friday, March 30, 2012 9:09:02 AM UTC-4, Niles Johnson wrote: > > > Indeed, these are good places to look -- especially the recommendation of > > browsing the rings directory to see how those are implemented (e.g. > > polynomial rings). It might make more sense for RingOfWittVectors to > > inherit from CommutativeRing instead of Ring. Also, it wouldn't be a bad > > idea to open a Trac ticket for this now. Then I and other interested > > parties could continue to discuss specifics of your implementation there. > > I was about to create a ticket when I found this: ticket > 11457<%20http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11457>. > It is nice as it gives me somewhere to start. Should I (or we) highjack > this or open a new ticket? I was planning on implementing sums and > products in a different way (and more efficient, in many cases), but give > the user a few different choices of methods to perform the computations. > > BTW, I am going to use bitbucket to keep my (not ready for prime time) > code:https://bitbucket.org/finotti/witt-sage. It already has some code > (as ".sage" files) and I will put my (slow) updates there. If anyone wants > write access, just write me and I can add you. > > I should also say that I might have quite a few time constrains these > days... I don't expect to get this done until mid summer. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org