On May 10, 7:01 pm, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > kcrisman <kcris...@gmail.com> writes: > > This only works for x, though. > > I feel obligated to jump in here and say that this is one of the most > confusing and "not beautiful" things I've seen in Sage - and you run > into it almost immediately when learning the ropes. Yuck. >
To be clear, are you complaining about defining *only* x or that x *is*, in fact, predefined? In any case, this is a discussion we probably don't need to rehash now, granted that there will never be peace between the Python purists and Maple wannabes. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
