On 06/01/12 02:05, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > Secondly, it shouldn't be a problem but to verify: having a trademark on the > name does not present a problem for being included in Debian et al., right?
The Firefox/Iceweasel mess was the result of Mozilla's stance that you aren't allowed to distribute a modified Firefox and still use the trademarked Firefox logo and name. Their reasoning was that you could patch Firefox to suck, and that would tarnish the brand. On the other hand, not allowing modification and redistribution violates Debian's free software guidelines. If we don't care about downstream patched versions that use the Sage branding, this won't be a problem. If we do, then they can rebrand or not patch. I don't see it as much of a problem. -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
