On Wednesday, June 20, 2012 10:42:40 AM UTC-7, jason wrote: > > On 6/20/12 12:37 PM, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, June 19, 2012 9:29:45 PM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote: > > > > When you run 'make' in SAGE_ROOT, it builds sage and runs 'make > > doc-html'. I propose changing this so it instead runs 'make > > doc-html-jsmath', which uses jsMath to display math, rather than png > > images. In my experience, using jsMath is much faster, and the > > output looks good. (Individual users can make this the default by > > setting the environment variable SAGE_DOC_JSMATH to "yes", by the > way.) > > > > > > One advantage to *not* using jsMath: the docs using jsMath take about > > 500 megabytes, compared to about 300 without jsMath. I haven't checked > > with MathJax. (I still think it's worth using jsMath.) > > Is that because a copy of jsmath is copied over to the output directory? >
I think so. > MathJax will be a lot smaller (if we don't use the image fonts). > Ah, you're right: switching from jsMath to MathJax changes the disk space from 526M to 296M on my machine. -- John -- To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel URL: http://www.sagemath.org
