On Tuesday, 11 September 2012 20:16:37 UTC+8, Volker Braun wrote: > > But I need the classical invariants / covariants with their conventional > names and normalizations in the literature.
I don't think that 98% of Grace and Young (http://archive.org/details/algebraofinvaria00graciala) belong to core Sage. I'd say it might be an optional package. I don't mind discriminants and other bits of the classical invariant theory which went on to live their lives in the modern maths, but, say, catalecticants, minimal systems of invariants for 5-ics, etc, please, give me a break... > I'm not trying to do the most general SL(n,C) representation theory here. > > On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 1:12:57 PM UTC+1, Dima Pasechnik wrote: >> >> Yes, it's great, but I would rather like to see it packaged as invariants >> of a representation of SL(2,C), not >> as invariants of a binary form. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
