Heey! Do we actually need to have a dict of a dict? Aren't sets implemented with some other data structure? I suppose if networkX uses this approach then it is doable!
Best, Jernej On Wednesday, 2 January 2013 09:22:08 UTC+1, Nathann Cohen wrote: > > Hellooooooooooo !!! > > You are totally right about the performance issue, but do you know the > memory size of a Sage graph compared to dict of dict ? I have no idea -- I > have just been *VERY* scared by the size of a dict of dict compared to a C > array in the past. > > Nathann > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
