On Thursday, April 11, 2013 4:27:57 PM UTC+2, Pavel Panchekha wrote:
>
> I've made some updates on the bug tracker following comments there.  Is 
> there anything I should do to help people take another look at the patch 
> and hopefully push it through acceptance?
>
> Just wait for someone interested to have time enough to look at it :)
Or find someone still unaware of it and who might be interested... 
typically by posting here as you've just done. 
I unfortunately have not much time right now and other priorities as far as 
sage is concerned.

> - Pavel Panchekha
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 6:20 AM, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Jean-Pierre Flori 
>> <jpf...@gmail.com<javascript:>> 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 10:07:31 AM UTC+1, John Cremona wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I for one would really like smalljac to be in Sage.
>> >>
>> > +1
>> >
>> > And with PARI 2.6.0 coming, well also have fast point counting for 
>> elliptic
>> > curve in small characteristic.
>> >
>> > One issue raised on the Trac ticket: smalljac is 64 bits only, so can we
>> > make it an optional (and not only experimental) spkg?
>>
>> I don't agree.  I think we *can* make it standard.  It will just
>> require more work and more thought.
>> All smalljac does is provide a *faster* implementation of functions
>> already in sage.
>> On 64-bit it will get built and used -- on 32-bit it won't get built,
>> and instead we'll fall
>> back to using existing functionality.
>>
>>  -- William
>>
>> > I'd say most computers are 64 bits anyway now... so I would not mind it
>> > being optional.
>> > But does it really change anything anyway? except for the fact that Drew
>> > Sutherland might be more pleased if the package is optional rather than
>> > experimental?
>> > I don't think we have any specific license requirement either for 
>> optional
>> > and experimental spkg, do we?
>> >
>> > --
>> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>> Groups
>> > "sage-devel" group.
>> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>> an
>> > email to sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> > To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
>> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> William Stein
>> Professor of Mathematics
>> University of Washington
>> http://wstein.org
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the 
>> Google Groups "sage-devel" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sage-devel/BqedaFjCm38/unsubscribe?hl=en
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>> sage-devel+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> To post to this group, send email to sage-...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> .
>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to