On 25 Mar 2014 13:14, "Nathann Cohen" <nathann.co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thus, I wondered if it would be interesting to have a "# bug" flag for doctests. Those doctests would *NOT* be tested by default, and all those doctests would be ... broken. Some projects, with gcc being one example I believe, have "expected failures" Whilst not executing tests which display bugs might be attractive to some, I think it would be better to execute the test and report the failure as an expected failure. There is more chance someone will fix it then. Dave -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
