On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Michael Orlitzky <mich...@orlitzky.com>wrote:
> On 04/27/2014 04:57 PM, P Purkayastha wrote: > > This is strange. Two of my earlier messages got deleted. Does anyone > > know why? Perhaps because I only wrote the URL to the ticket? > > > > Getting back to the question, this was fixed two years ago and is > > awaiting a review. See #13422 > > > > Ah, thanks for the link. Do I understand correctly that this would still > throw a ValueError, but allow the user to avoid it by supplying his own > (at least two) ticks? > > If so, I would rather see it done automatically. Why throw a ValueError > and make me supply a second tick when sage can do it automatically? If I > don't like the ticks that sage comes up with, *then* I can supply my > own. I think that will be less cumbersome in the common case of > just-plot-the-thing-already. (And if I supply only one tick, just let me > do it.) > The patch is to do it automatically. It will raise an error *only* if you give ticks manually, and what you give is insufficient (see the examples in the doctests). Another ticket #13528 is positively reviewed but depends on this patch. So, please review this one #13422 if you are interested. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
