bump.

In case anyone has actual feedback. I will try to roll out these changes
sometime next week.


On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 7:03 PM, R. Andrew Ohana <andrew.oh...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I've been working on setting up an instance of buildbot for the eventual
> replacement of patchbot. It doesn't have all the features of patchbot yet,
> so for the moment being it is an addition, not a replace.
>
> If you would like to try it out, I have setup a sandbox trac server at
> http://trac-sandbox.sagedev.org to play with.
>
> How to use:
>
> 1. Push and pull to g...@trac-sandbox.sagedev.org like you would the
> normal trac server
> 2. Put your branch on some ticket, and mark it as needs review or positive
> review. This will trigger the buildbot to test your branch.
> 3. You should see on the ticket (right below the ticket number) the status
> of the buildbot. Once the build has started, this should provide a link to
> the build.
>
> Things to know (caveats):
>
> 1. The sandbox is based on a snapshot of the trac server from a few weeks
> ago, nothing that has happened in the meantime will be seen on the snapshot.
> 2. The branch links will likely be broken -- this is a side affect of not
> setting up a second cgit instance (and will not be broken once this stuff
> migrates back to the real trac instance).
> 3. Anything you put on the sandbox should be considered lost -- it will
> not be migrated back over to the real trac server.
> 4. Right now there is a single buildslave, so only one ticket will be
> tested at a time. You can see the overall status of the buildbot at
> http://build.sagedev.org/waterfall.
> 5. Changes that require new upstream tarballs won't currently work (unless
> your tarball is already in a standard place) -- adding this is on the TODO
> list.
>
> -----
>
> I have also done a bit of refactoring with some of the other trac plugin
> code, so please make sure that I haven't broken your favorite feature.
>
> -----
>
> Finally, for those of you who use the xmlrpc interface (all 3 of you),
> I've added the following new functions:
>
>  - str merger.getMerge(int) -- takes a ticket number and returns the merge
> that trac uses both for the diff display, and for the buildbot
>  - list buildbot.get_build(int) -- takes a ticket number and returns a
> 3-tuple [builder_name, build_number, status], where status is -1 for in
> progress, and is the buildbot result code for completed builds (0 for
> success, 1 for warnings, 2 for failures, etc...)
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew
>



-- 
Andrew

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to