I've looked over the code, and it seems fine to me, however I am not that 
versed in function fields. I believe that the best person to review 
something like this would be someone who understands the function field 
functionality better than I do. I am more than willing to officially review 
it though.

On Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:45:28 AM UTC-4, Simon King wrote:
>
> Hi all, 
>
> On 2014-09-24, Simon King <simon...@uni-jena.de <javascript:>> wrote: 
> > No. I rather think the _element_constructor_ method of function fields 
> > should be able to deal with input that is a string. 
> > 
> > I will open a trac ticket for it. 
>
> ... which is #17033 and needs review. 
>
> Best regards, 
> Simon 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to