On Saturday, December 6, 2014 9:33:57 AM UTC-8, Martin R wrote: > > The installation instructions say that ecl is roughly 3 times slower. > Once upon a time, when I was a fricas contributor, it made quite a > difference. But back than, sbcl was a no-go for sage (I forgot why). >
I think it was because to build sbcl from source, you needed (and still need) an ANSI-compliant Common Lisp already on your machine. So we would maybe need to ship two lisps, sbcl plus another one to build sbcl. -- John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
