It isn't actually said that Sage should be rewritten. But it suggest that Julia would have been a better language. And that Sage as it is written by mathematicians looks very amateuristic to a computer scientist.
On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 1:03:39 PM UTC+2, Volker Braun wrote: > > Ahh if I only had a dollar every time somebody insists that the only way > forward is to rewrite $large_software_project in $fad_of_the_year... > > For some reason the advice from people that actually make large projects > work always turns out to be diametrically opposed, e.g. > http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000069.html > > > > On Tuesday, March 31, 2015 at 12:11:34 PM UTC+2, Jean-Pierre Flori wrote: >> >> Let's replace Python by Julia :p >> >> >> http://lavieestmaloptimisee.blogspot.fr/2015/03/les-informaticiens-meprisent.html?view=classic >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
