This problem is tackled in http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19084
Would you review? On Thursday, August 6, 2015 at 6:36:54 PM UTC+9, Martin Albrecht wrote: > > Hi, > > On Wednesday 05 Aug 2015 23:35:26 Kwankyu wrote: > > My Singular procedures do not need a ring (they internally construct > > rings) as input, but my Sage function wrapping the procedure raises an > > error if I do not specify a ring (via ring=...). I can use a dummy for > > this, but this does not look elegant. Is there a way to avoid > constructing > > a dummy ring in this situation? > > We could do this: > > - if no ring is given we try to find one as we do currently. > - if that fails because the inputs are not polynomials of any kind, we > could > use a dummy ring ? > > Cheers, > Martin > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
