Those interested in documentation might want to look at few tickets.

1) Nathann is making an automatic index of functions better, see http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19061 . (But somebody should review #19067 before that will continue. It is short.)

2) There is a discussion about guide to writing docstrings: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/19041 . For example do we want to *always* have INPUT and OUTPUT section, even if the function returns nothing and have no arguments?

3) And then it is still open if the index of functions can be written from user perspective, or from implementation perspective: http://trac.sagemath.org/ticket/18534 . My suggestion one is adding functions from categories to index of posets.py. Suggestion two is add an index of functions ta categories of poset and finite poset and add a link to them. Suggestion three is to make a kind of introduction to finite posets and put index there.

 * * *

4) Do others feel that Sage is like a big house with tresures hidden in the corridors - without map to found those?

--
Jori Mäntysalo

Reply via email to