John Cremona wrote: > ...not to a user who types > > sage: X.fancy_function? > > though. Credit needs to be easily and obviously accessible or it will > not get noticed.
My impression is that no (fine-grained) credit at all is better than what we have now, and that credits generated from the git history would be even better, though not perfect. But again, that's just my impression, perhaps some people do bother keeping the AUTHORS blocks up- to-date :-) -- Marc -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
