2015-10-12 22:45:08 UTC+2, Snark:
>
> Le lundi 12 oct. 2015 à 13:02:38 (-0700), Volker Braun a écrit : 
> > On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 3:46:29 PM UTC+2, Snark wrote: 
> > > 
> > > Does that mean that the libgap in sagemath will get part of upstream 
> GAP? 
> > > 
> > 
> > A better interop between Sage and GAP is definitely desirable. I don't 
> > think anybody has a clear plan at this point but I'll be at the meeting 
> ;-) 
> > 
>
> We are uncomfortable with packaging sage-the-distribution's libgap in 
> Debian, 
> because as the name doesn't say it's sage-specific, we might be in some 
> trouble 
> if GAP were to release a real-GAP libgap (even in some years... Debian is 
> about 
> long-term). 
>
> So if that lib could get upstream's blessing (or just get renamed 
> libsagegap), 
> that would make things easier.
>

See a discussion of that point on the gap development list at

https://mail.gap-system.org/pipermail/gap/2015-October/000176.html 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to