On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Volker Braun <vbraun.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've had people at workshops trying to compile Sage (never mind using > binaries) and they were SOL because their system bash was linked against the > wrong version of some library. If you can't compile it you surely can't use > it 6 times.
David Roe had no trouble compiling Sage. It's wasteful to have to do it many times repeatedly. > Also, your use case is a bit weird; Parallel installations on the same > server? It's David's use case for Sage Days 71. It seems to me like a reasonable use case for development. > Still, not a problem with rpaths. Cool, in theory. > > Finally, if you don't have enough memory to build the docs once then you'll > have a bad time running the tests when developing (you do run the tests, > right?). Sage is getting more and more unwieldy. I fear for its survival. - William -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
