On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 03:19:14PM -0700, William Stein wrote:
> There are very good reasons to supporting both modularization and much
> more standard approaches to packaging. ... Since -- based on responses --
> almost nobody else in our community seems to get this either,
For the record, modularity is a major topic of the Sage Days we are
having right now (although the focus has been more about modularity at
the granularity of the Sage library w.r.t its dependencies than within
the Sage library):
https://wiki.sagemath.org/days77
Cheers,
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nthi...@users.sf.net>
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
