Sorry if I sounded rude or disrispectful, It wasn't my intention at all. Let me try to redeem myself by proposing some constructive proposal: what about a function/method level mark (be it a decorator or a comment)?
It could have more benefits than just treating correctly the doctests. It could also help, for instance, creating a documentation section automatically, or even not exposing the function at all if the corresponding package is not installed. Of course, this idea has many drawbacks: the optional functionality might deppend only on certain parameters (e.g. the 'algorithm' keyword)... but maybe they could be worked out. El martes, 12 de abril de 2016, 23:52:18 (UTC+2), Nicolas M. Thiéry escribió: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 02:03:15AM -0700, mmarco wrote: > > I agree with Volker here. If the problem is that writing a > > # optional blah > > at the end of each line that starts with > > sage: > > maybe limited to a certain portion of your file, that sounds like > the > > kind of thing you could easily do with some simple plugin for your > > favourite text editor. Or a regex substitution. > > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > Don't worry, I know how to use my editor for automated tasks. > > Sorry, I could not resist. I know, I tend to be picky and grumpy. > > It's not specifically about this particular e-mail. And I have no > problem with suggestions for improvements being discussed and not > being accepted; on the contrary the diversity of perspectives is a > strength of this community. > > On the other hand I am frustrated with the tone of sage-devel these > days. I would really appreciate if e-mails would acknowledge others > efforts; something like "thanks for the suggestion and for > investigating how to implement it". > > I am not going to quit sage-devel just for that, but others will (and > have). > > Cheers, > Nicolas > -- > Nicolas M. Thiéry "Isil" <nth...@users.sf.net <javascript:>> > http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
