On Monday, June 6, 2016, Jeroen Demeyer <jdeme...@cage.ugent.be> wrote:
> On 2016-06-06 05:25, William Stein wrote: > >> I think that **all** development of Sage should be done using standard >> Python packaging. Of course Cython is very well supported using >> setuptools >> > > or distutils if you prefer that. Isn't there one canonical one to use now? There used to be distutils, distibute, setuptools, all competing/forking and more... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Sent from my massive iPhone 6 plus. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
