On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 12:15:18 PM UTC, François wrote: > > > > On 15/09/2016, at 00:00, Jeroen Demeyer <jdem...@cage.ugent.be > <javascript:>> wrote: > > > > On 2016-09-14 13:34, Dima Pasechnik wrote: > >> One still would have to do something to provide fortran, though. > > > > Exactly, so it's pointless to build Sage with clang since you won't be > able to compile any Fortran code. And I think that mixing compiler suites > (clang + gfortran) does not really work either. > > The last thing on mixing compiler suite is to be proven. > But then I have mixed C/C++ and Fortran from different > vendors before (mainly GNU and IBM). >
FYI, R is normally built on OSX using clang (from XCode) and gfortran. Given the huge (compared to Sage) user base of R, it looks as if it should work quite well. And we can just steal their binary gfortran package... > > In the last days where sage-on-gentoo-on-OSX was viable, > I had inbox (at least) compiled with clang using a gfortran compiled > blas and possibly lapack (netlib). Most of the rest was gcc > compiled. > > François -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
