Hi Thierry, do you realise that Pentium III has been out of production for 15 years? It does not strike me as an important issue that an emulator for this truly museum piece of hardware does not produce binaries compatible with other, slightly less outdated, pieces of hardware...
I understand that most probably you'd like to build a binary that works on as many archs as possible. I am not sure that the approach to use such an outdated piece is the right one; nothing gets seriously tested on such hardware nowadays. (E.g. I doubt that gcc is tested on Pentium III nowadays...). On Friday, September 23, 2016 at 6:38:55 AM UTC, Simon King wrote: > > Hi Thierry, > > On 2016-09-22, Thierry <sage-goo...@lma.metelu.net <javascript:>> wrote: > > Yes, though in the first case the (pentium3 emulated) processor is only > > capable of 32 bit (no lm flag), while in the other cases (genuine > pentium4 > > and genuine core2duo), while the kernel is 32bit, the proc is capable of > > 64bit. > > Not sure if that can be a problem. > > >> Does meataxe work, if you do *not* move the binary to a different > >> platform but keep it on the platform it was compiled with? > > > > Yes. > > "Yes" for both of the two platforms? > > Best regards, > Simon > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
