On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Jori Mäntysalo <jori.mantys...@uta.fi> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2016, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
>
>> As far as I know, the only real use-case for milestone is a milestone like
>> `sage-duplicate/invalid/wontfix` or `sage-pending`. I think that every
>> milestone of the form `sage-X.Y` is essentially treated equivalently.
>
>
> I normally use "sage-N" and mark myself as the author when I plan to do
> something in near future, and "sage-(N+1)" rarely when I guess that version
> N will be out before I got something done. I have used "sage-wishlist" few
> times when I have an idea. If I report a bug, I use "sage-N" and left
> author-field empty if I am not sure that I'll make patch myself.
>
>  * * *
>
> But we don't have any plans like "Version 8 will be out about q1/2018 and
> will have mostly more support for numerical linear algebra.", and so
> milestones are not really used.

Yeah, I guess not.  That's too bad...

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to