On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Travis Scrimshaw <tsc...@ucdavis.edu> wrote: > > > On Wednesday, December 7, 2016 at 9:41:32 AM UTC-6, Jeroen Demeyer wrote: >> >> On 2016-12-07 14:52, Kwankyu Lee wrote: >> > What do you think? >> >> Why do this? I guess this will mostly lead to bitrotting code that would >> better be merged into Sage. > > > If it is an independent package, then there should be minimal bit rot.
The existence of many such packages will also motivate us to define the external API of Sage more clearly. > It > doesn't strictly force a minimal version of Sage onto the users and could > potentially be easy to install for Sage users who do not want to mess with > git/branches. > > Best, > Travis > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sage-devel" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- William (http://wstein.org) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
