On Mar 11, 2017, at 01:32 , Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> Speaking of optional packages, we should also think of a strategy to deal
> with optional packages which have dependencies which are not part of Sage.
>
> For example, the optional rst2ipynb package requires pandoc, which is not in
> Sage.
>
> On the other hand, in #22378 I wanted to package surf as optional package and
> got complains from Dima that I couldn't because it had dependencies not in
> Sage (such as libjpeg).
If you can get surf to build/run on macOS that would be terrific. I have not
managed to do it, and AFAICT, no one else has either.
Justin
--
Justin C. Walker, Curmudgeon-At-Large
Director
Institute for the Enhancement of the Director's Income
--------
"Weaseling out of things is what separates us from the animals.
Well, except the weasel."
- Homer J Simpson
--------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
