The successful launch with my built of sage with python3 seems well explained by John.
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 5:37:10 PM UTC+2, Frédéric Chapoton wrote > > The road towards a full python3 sage is still quite long, and my > motivation gets weaker, as it seems that not so many people care about that. > This is painful. A novice question about design: do we aim to make sage (1) "buildable either with python2 or with python3" or (2) "runnable either with python2 or with python3". Am I clear enough? If (2), then you build once and then sage can be run with either python2 or with python3. I prefer (2), but I don't know which is easier to achieve. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
