Could you please be more specific? * there are currently 170 doctests in the interface itself (93% coverage, including quite a few testing the conversion to sage objects), and some more in the symbolic directory. Which parts of the interface would you like to be more tested?
* Which parts of the interface would you like to see more heavily documented? There is some module level documentation highlighting some features of FriCAS. The intention of the interface is, of course, not having to learn FriCAS's own language (which is excellent, but that's a different story) - you should be able to simply use sage's syntax. Martin Am Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 08:51:53 UTC+2 schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier: > > +1, with some wishes : > - doctests > -documentation > > -- > Emmanuel Charpentier > > > Le mardi 26 septembre 2017 16:06:36 UTC+2, Martin R a écrit : >> >> Dear all, >> >> I would like to propose to make the package FriCAS optional. FriCAS >> provides some functionality which is otherwise either mostly missing (e.g., >> guessing formulas, lazy powerseries), or not as complete as might be >> desirable (e.g., symbolic integration, solving differential equations). >> >> The FriCAS interface was completely rewritten after FriCAS was demoted to >> experimental in #18563 and is now quite mature, containing lots of doctests. >> >> I opened trac ticket #23847 for the process. >> >> Martin >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
