On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 1:19 AM, Jori Mäntysalo <jori.mantys...@uta.fi> wrote:
> It is much faster to say sum(1 for _ in graphs.nauty_geng(7)) than sum(1 > for _ in graphs(7)), and after #19919 we have nauty as a standard package. > > Will I break something if I change graphs(n) without any additional > parameter to use nauty? A user really needing the old code could then say > graphs(n, property=lambda x: True). I think that Sage documentation makes > no promise at all about the order in which graphs are generated. Sounds good to me. You might add an algorithm keyword to the graphs function, which defaults to nauty. David > > > -- > Jori Mäntysalo > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
