On Tuesday, March 13, 2018 at 10:26:55 PM UTC, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
>
> 2018-03-13 20:01 GMT+01:00 Jeroen Demeyer <j.de...@ugent.be <javascript:>
> >:
> >
> > On 2018-03-13 18:33, Samuel Lelievre wrote:
> >>
> >> Let me try to make the case for making JupyterLab a standard package.
> >
> > What is your case for *NOT* making it an optional package first?
>
> My view is that since it's pip-installable, it's as though it were
> already an optional package.
>
> What would it mean to make it an optional package? Maybe
> I just don't understand that.
>

basically, make up a slot in build/pkgs/ with some mostly meta-data.

And we need a vote. Yes, I vote for make it optional, or better.

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to