Update: sage: S = SymmetricGroup(4) sage: S1 = S.subgroup(S.gens()[:1]) sage: S2 = S.subgroup(S.gens()[:1]) sage: S1 is S2 False
Since the same is true for subgroups of permutation groups, I wonder if this is intended? The reason I am asking is that I implemented abelian groups and their automorphisms with gap sage.groups.abelian_gps.abelian_group_gap sage.groups.abelian_gps. abelian_aut using unique representations for subgroups. I did I miss something? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
