Can we exclude the possibility that this is a regression? As far as I can see, the expensive part is in creating the parent 'StandardTableaux(50)', which is a bit strange, isn't it?
Martin Am Mittwoch, 13. Februar 2019 22:02:37 UTC+1 schrieb Volker Braun: > > On Wednesday, February 13, 2019 at 5:33:38 PM UTC+1, Travis Scrimshaw > wrote: >> >> My (complete) guess is that there are so many partitions of 50 (204226 to >> be precise) and in such a tight for loop that the garbage collector does >> not have enough time to actually collect the parents being created and >> discarded. >> > > The Python GC also starts collection if there are many new objects, so I > don't think this is it. > > Running the example takes > 1 gb of ram; Surely a smaller example could > be used with the same code coverage. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
