Hi! Is it a Python object?
A cached method (if that hasn't changed since I last looked at the code) stores the cached values in some dict stored as an attribute, and when you pickle the object (at least when no __reduce__ method interferes), it should automatically store that attribute. But you say that the method is called "genus". So, probably it has not function arguments, right? It could be that the cache is stored differently in that case. I think if pickling doesn't preserve the content of the cached method then it is a bug. Best regards, Simon On 2019-06-27, Kwankyu Lee <ekwan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thursday, June 27, 2019 at 4:41:30 PM UTC+9, John Cremona wrote: >> >> I think this is one disadvantage of using the cached_method decorator, >> instead of the clumsier way of actually storing the result in the object, >> eg. by setting X._genus. In your example I cannot think of a reason why we >> would not want to store the genus as an attribute after computing it. >> > > I thought the same. I expected the cached_method decorator could make a > (pseudo) attribute attached to the object magically somehow if I cast the > right spell... > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/qf2dpe%247rp9%241%40blaine.gmane.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
