On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 2:59 PM Emmanuel Charpentier
<emanuel.charpent...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Case in point:
>
> During a few years, someone called Sho Katemori created and maintained a 
> couple of (very) useful Sage-related packages fpr emacs users:
>
> sage-shell-mode: an emacs interface to Sage, allowing the integration of 
> typeset maths and 2D graphics in an emacs buffer managing a Sage interactive 
> session ;
> ob-sagemath, an org-mode interface to Sage, alowing integration of "live" 
> Sage code snippets in a document ;
> anything-sage, auto-complete-sage and helm sage, Sage extensions of various 
> emacs utilities.
>
>
> Note: sage-shell-mode was a very welcome and timely  replacement for the old 
> sage-mode package, deemed unmaintainable by its maintainer (Ivan Andrus). It 
> seems to have become popular (for Sage-reasonable values of "popular", of 
> course...).
>
> However, Sho Katemori seems to have dropped off the Net: his (her ?) last 
> contribution to his/hers Github repositories dates back to march 2018 ; an 
> attempt to mail him/her is still unanswered. As a consequence, those package 
> have some unanswered issues.
>
> It seems that sage-shell mode has been somehow "adopted" by Sage : its 
> current repository is now part of the Sage hierarchy on Github, which allowed 
> Frédéric Chapoton, then myself, to integrate some change needed for Python 3 
> compatibility.
>
> I'd like to propose similar change to ob-sagemath ; it is also possible that 
> some other users may propose changes to the other packages (which are not 
> (yet) my cup of tea...).
>
> Hence the questions:
>
> Can we "adopt" these packages as we did for sage-shell-mode ?
> If so, how ?

The easiest would be if the author transferred the github repos to
Sagemath github organization.
I'm cc-ing this to all the email addresses I found on the web...

If we don't get such a transfer done (which obviously needs the
author's involvement)
then we can just have copies of anything-sage, auto-complete-sage and
helm sage hosted.

ob-sage is harder, as it does not have a license...

Best
Dima
>
>
> And, more generally:
>
> Do we have a policy about  external but sage-related software suffering 
> "abandon" by their original authors/maintainers ?
>
> Advice requested...
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-devel" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/04893dfc-54d7-4edb-99c1-4ac9f50a9aef%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-devel" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/CAAWYfq1WQ27SOjf_2jtWG9M37ZSgHswCaFqS8A8pQYjyp%3DZv1Q%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to