I have a question about the future of srange under python 3, which changes the behaviour of range. Probably this has been discussed before but I could not find it.
In 9.0.beta10 we have sage: range(1,3) range(1, 3) sage: srange(1,3) [1, 2] sage: sxrange(1,3) <generator object at 0x7efd99ef8e88> sage: [1..2] [1, 2] sage: type(range(1,3)), type(srange(1,3)), type(sxrange(1,3)), type([1..2]) (<class 'range'>, <class 'list'>, <class 'generator'>, <class 'list'>) and no xrange anymore. Would it make sense to drop sxrange and make srange an iterator like range, while keeping [a..b] as a list as suggested by its notation? Chris -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/eb56b434-5e1e-4ce7-9585-16f00efb49f6%40googlegroups.com.