Dear all, I do maintain Python libraries that depend on Sage and uses the Sage doctest framework. I do my best so that the libraries install and work on older versions of Sage. However, some features are only working with recent enough versions of Sage. But I still want them to pass the test suite with older Sage versions.
I thought that having a tag looking like sage: my_computation() # optional: sage >= 9.0 would help me a lot. - Any alternative suggestion? - Can I do that with the current doctest framework? It would be nice to be able to specify optional tags on the fly. - Any vote pro or against such a tag? I think that if we go for it, everybody should agree so that it becomes a standard and gets specified in the SageMath documentation. Of course such a tag would be useless for the Sage library itself. Best Vincent -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-devel" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-devel/103a321e-6c58-f8cc-a1e3-cf1e426ec551%40gmail.com.
