On Mar 20, 2007, at 12:40 PM, Prof. J. E. Cremona wrote:
> It is a pity that once the journalist hears that a computation was > done > "on a supercomputer" they only think of hardware, and never software. > This gives the impression that all we need to have in order to do > harder > and harder "sums" is bigger computers. If SAGE was used this should > have been said, with all due credit to its creators (and the > authors of > whatever constituent parts of SAGE were used in the computation). I believe SAGE (the software) was not used. I got the impression it was all C code. David --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-forum URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
