> There might be something simpler though.

How about if we overload Python's built-in map function such that it also 
works for matrices and falls back to the built-in one for the rest? Or if 
that is an issue because it might be confusing for Python users, we could 
call it smap/sage_map?

So for example:
sage: A = random_matrix(GF(127),2,2)
sage: B = smap(lambda x: x + 1, A)

Thoughts?
Martin

-- 
name: Martin Albrecht
_pgp: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x8EF0DC99
_www: http://www.informatik.uni-bremen.de/~malb
_jab: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-forum
URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to