On Jan 15, 2008 10:48 AM, Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Mind you , that is not very easy and requires quite a lot of Python > > knowledge, as I am discovering in doing the same job on my modular > > symbols C++ code. > > yep, it's not so straightforward, i agree. And the resulting object > would not have the right Sage object as a parent, which is a pity (in > my case an unstable algebra should inherit the methods of a polynomial > algebra).
That's not necessarily true. You can wrap C++ code but have it fit nicely into the Sage class heiarchy. See, e.g., finite_field_givaro.pyx in the Sage source tree. > In fact, it's not so much that there is a lot of code to define an > unstable algebra, it's rather that i don't feel i have (just now) the > competence to merge it gracefully into Sage. We really need to make it easier for developers to get up to speed with Sage! Now is definitely the time... William --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-forum URLs: http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage/ and http://sage.scipy.org/sage/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
