Thanks for the reply and for the corrections on trac.
While trying to fix and issue I found that I was essentially
reinventing the wheel and that my problem had been solved elsewhere on
the codebase.
However when I tried to understand how they had deal with it I found
they had not.

The article [d2] seems to use a different definition of eccentricity
and by extension of diameter where the graph does not need to be
connected.
Meaning sage.graphs.distances_all_pairs.diameter() would return
different values for different algorithms, which as a user I would not
expect.
How has Sage dealt with these cases in the past? Should I restrict it
to the previous definition or maybe have a different function with a
different name?



On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 8:27 PM David Coudert <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your interest in this project.
>
> If you push your code to a ticket, we will certainly help you improving it. 
> We do our best to help all contributors.
>
> Sincerely,
> David.
>
> Le lundi 9 mars 2020 20:05:24 UTC+1, João Tavares a écrit :
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>> I am a third year undergraduate student from IST - Lisbon University in 
>> Applied Mathematics and Computer Science. I am very
>> interested in the "Diameter, radius, eccentricities, and distances" project. 
>> In fact I have started implementing [d2].
>>
>> I have some knowledge about the trac system, having submited a small 
>> enhancement in the past, however I have a small question regarding it.
>>
>> Is it acceptable for me to push my current implementation to trac under the 
>> need_work tag and perhaps get some feedback? I have been working under the 
>> assumption the given graph is undirected (temporarily) so my code is not yet 
>> complete.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the replies in advance.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> João Tavares
>>
>> IST - Lisbon University
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sage-gsoc" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-gsoc/46f0612e-4736-4a7a-883d-83a53748ee4e%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sage-gsoc" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sage-gsoc/CAJEthcQ7iq0orSQQ%2BqSX5JpARfhUyv6rdMmEyUX%3DeYvOGL0xxQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to